Why, then, is Mr. Obama
pushing for more judges on the D.C. Circuit? The answer is pretty clear. The
D.C. Circuit has ruled against the president’s agenda in several high-profile
cases in recent years. Most notably, the court invalidated a rule applying the
Dodd-Frank financial reform law, overruled a burdensome Environmental
Protection Agency rule regulating cross-state power-plant emissions, and ruled
Mr. Obama’s sham “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board
were unconstitutional. It’s no surprise that Mr. Obama is trying to improve his
chances before the court by packing it with judges whom he thinks — rightly or wrongly
— will rubber-stamp his policies.
As if that is not bad enough President Obama is ignoring
his duty to other circuits who unlike the DC Circuit have judicial emergencies
(about half of which do not have a judge nominated to fill the slot) that could
use additional judges. The lack of need
for additional judges on the DC Circuit has long been noted by Republicans and
Democrats. Von Spakovsky and Slattery note:
In fact, there is such a
lack of need for more judges in the D.C. Circuit that in 2006, eight Democratic
senators, led by Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont and Charles E. Schumer of New
York, sent a letter to then-Sen. Arlen Specter, who at the time was Republican
chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, asking for a postponement of the
confirmation hearing for one of President Bush’s nominees to that court (who
was never confirmed) because the court’s low workload “did not warrant” more
judges. They pointed out that, since 1997, “by every relevant benchmark, the
caseload for that circuit has only dropped further.” Since then, the D.C.
Circuit’s workload has dropped even more.
Court packing was not appropriate during the desperate
times of the Great Desperation and it is certainly not appropriate now. For more details and statistics go here.
Shame on President Obama for ignoring his duty to other circuits in
order to nominate judges to the DC Circuit in an effort to promote his illegal
agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment