Did Al Sharpton Pick the Attorney General Nominee?

The Daily Caller has an interesting article whether Loretta Lynch is the choice of vote fraud committer Al Sharpton.  Sharpton is arguably the leading vote fraud denier on the left and even has provided standing ovations to those who are convicted of vote fraud.  Regardless of whether this is Sharpton’s pick or not she has some potentially troubling views on voting as disclosed in a recent video that has surfaced.   At a minimum she should be thoroughly questioned on these matters.  Those views are:

Mandela and King knew we had to continue working.  . . . 50 years after the March on Washington, 50 years after the Civil Rights Movement, we stand in this country at a time when we see people trying to take back so much of what Dr. King fought for.  We stand in this country. People try and take over the State House and reverse the goals that have been made in voting in this country.

But I’m proud to tell you that the Department of Justice has looked at these laws and looked at what’s happening in the Deep South, and in my home state of North Carolina has brought lawsuits against those voting rights changes that seek to limit our ability to stand up and exercise our rights as citizens. And those lawsuits will continue.

There are many potential problems with this statement but we will highlight two right now. 

1.  The Department of Justice literally lost one of the voting cases in the “Deep South” of South Carolina so badly that they had to pay attorney’s fees.  Further, Voter ID has been upheld in the Supreme Court. 

2.  Nelson Mandela supported voter ID.  

We are looking forward to her hearing to see how she answers for this speech and how she will handle voting in the all-important 2016 election. 

Nelson Mandela Supported Voter ID

Wisconsin is arguably the most vote fraud ridden state in the country.  It even allows people to vouch for other people to vote. The problems have been well documented by the non-partisan police department of Milwaukee.  Yet, GOP efforts to bring sanity to these problems are met with allegations of racism and oppression. 

One of those groups bringing those allegations is a liberal group in Wisconsin called One Wisconsin Now. One Wisconsin Now made a major PR blunder when it tried to capitalize on the death of Nelson Mandela in its efforts to support vote fraud and oppose Voter ID.  Nelson Mandela supported Voter ID.

Furthermore, South Africa, like most of the world, has a much more stringent system of election integrity than the United States and Wisconsin.  

That constitution allows for and supports a rigorous election integrity process far more stringent than anything GOP lawmakers have proposed in Wisconsin.  An October story from a South African news outlet explains in advance of the nation’s 2014 elections, “aspirant voters must produce a valid South African identity document when registering to vote and when voting.” That means procuring one of “three forms of official identification.”

One of those identification forms is new: a so-called “smartcard ID.” Although a new addition to the process, one election official said that “[a]ccommodating the new smartcard IDs has not been difficult.”

 . . . Online voter registration and voting are not allows. “You have to apply for registration and vote in person with valid ID,” reads the government’s elections website. Two of the common forms of identification, passports and drivers licenses, do not suffice for election ID purposes.

. . . The South African system stands in stark contrast to Wisconsin’s own election system. Voter registration is always available – including on election day – and early voting in some areas extends the amount of time voters have to cast ballots. No form of identification is required to cast a ballot and proof of residency is not always required to register to vote.

So while South Africa is embarrassed and concerned about the security gaffes involving a fraudulent sign language interpreter; the US and people of Wisconsin should be embarrassed and concerned about their voting system which has virtually no protections against vote fraud.