Democrat New Hampshire Governor Maggie
Hassan vetoed
a bill that would require a 30-day waiting period to vote claiming
the bill “places unreasonable restrictions upon all New Hampshire citizens’
right to vote in this state…”
Also the bill would redefine
domicile to a person’s primary residence or abode in a state where people could
vote in an election although they may be simply visit for a short time and
intend to move. Even political campaign workers or consultants could vote in
New Hampshire under the current laws.
Requiring voters to be in the
state for 30 days before voting would have prevented this type of voting that
goes against the spirit of the law. Democrat Secretary of State Bill Gardner supported
this bill. Gardner knows
that every New Hampshire vote counts. He stated:
We had
three ties in the last election cycle, one in the primary and two in the
general election, and we had six other recounts that were in the single digits.
Gardner also emphasizes
that in order to vote in New Hampshire, “…working on political campaigns is not
sufficient evidence.”
Other Republican lawmakers were
disappointed in Hassan’s veto. House Majority Leader Jack Flanagan said,
Our
citizens should have a reasonable expectation that their vote will not be
cancelled out by temporary visitors," he said. "Under our existing
laws our doors are still technically open for people with little intent on
staying here to participate in (the presidential) primary. That seems unfair to
most people, and it’s unfair to the process we hold so dear.
The state legislature will vote on vetoed bills in
September and hopefully Democrats will follow Secretary State Gardners lead to prevent vote fraud and "drive by voting" instead of the Governor's efforts to allow vote fraud and out of state political consultants voting.
No comments:
Post a Comment