Yesterday, the House Select Committee on Benghazi released
its March 4th subpoena
to the former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton as a response to Clinton’s
claim that she was never subpoenaed. (Watch the full press conference on the
Clinton email revelations here.)
Clinton attempted to mitigate the situation in a CNN
interview yesterday. Reporters and journalist echoed the thoughts of many
who are baffled at the way Clinton continues to evade her lack of transparency
throughout the developing revelations of lies. Carl Berstien stated,
[T]here are many self-inflicted
wounds because she very often wants to cut a corner on the whole truth. She
very often obfuscates.
Bloomberg’s Mark
Halperin notes,
Some of what she says is sort of
maybe technically true … but it evades a lot of the issues that people are
concerned about, including whether she did turn everything over[.]
After the Benghazi committee discovered Clinton exclusively
used a personal email and server for State Department work, the committee issued several subpoenas. The State Department was not the custodian of
Clinton’s record, and did not inform the committee or other investigations.
This meant no investigation before the Benghazi committee could access
Clinton’s official communications. Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy wrote in a press
release,
The committee has issued several
subpoenas, but I have not sought to make them public. I would not make this one
public now, but after Secretary Clinton falsely claimed the committee did not
subpoena her, I have no choice in order to correct the inaccuracy.
Gowdy highlights Clinton’s duties despite the subpoena
stating,
Secretary Clinton had a statutory
duty to preserve records from her entire time in office, and she had a legal
duty to cooperate with and tell the truth to congressional investigators
requesting her records going back to September of 2012. Yet despite direct
congressional inquiry, she refused to inform the public of her unusual email
arrangement.
Gowdy also questions the timing of when Clinton decided to
attempt to permanently destroy emails.
The Secretary left office in
February of 2013. By her own admission she did not delete or destroy emails
until the fall of 2014, well after this Committee had been actively engaged in
securing her emails from the Department of State. For 20 months, it was not too
burdensome or cumbersome for the Secretary to house records on her personal
server but mysteriously in the fall of 2014 she decided to delete and attempt
to permanently destroy those same records.
No comments:
Post a Comment