In a Federal
Election Commission (FEC) session last Wednesday, Republican Chairman Lee
Goodman warned
that the FEC could attempt to regulate book publishers under its authority to
make campaign finance rules. Chairman Goodman will be a featured panelist at
this year’s RNLA National
Election Law Seminar.
The heated
session related to a book by Congressman Paul Ryan. The FEC “declined
to definitively spare book publishers from the reach of campaign finance rules.”
Chairman Goodman wanted the Commission to guarantee the book would be exempt
from regulation under the “media exemption.” This is the exemption that empowers
newspaper editorials to comment on politicians without regulation. The Chairman
believes that book publishers should enjoy the same exemption.
During
the session, Chairman Goodman said, “I think
that's unfortunate. We have effectively asserted regulatory jurisdiction over a
book publisher."
In an interview
with Fox News, Chairman Goodman said, "That
is a shame. . . . We have wounded the free-press clause of the First Amendment.”
He said the refusal to include book publishers under this exception suggests “an
effort to constrict the media exemption within the commission."
Two
other members of the commission joined Chairman Goodman in support and released
a six-page statement
addressing their contention with the Commission’s vote. The statement points
out that “the legislative history of the media exemption indicates that
Congress did not intend to ‘limit or burden in any way the First Amendment
freedoms of the press and association. . . . The Commission has not limited the
press exemption to traditional news outlets, but rather has applied it to ‘news
stories, commentaries, and editorials, no
matter in what medium they are published.’”
The
Commission uses a two-prong test to apply the media exception. “First, the
Commission asks whether the entity engaging in the activity is a press or media
entity. If so, the media exemption applies as long as the entity (a) is not
owned or controlled by a political party, political committee, or candidate,
and (b) is acting as a press entity in conducting the activity at issue.”
As
Chairman Goodman observed in his statement, “the publisher’s
activities satisfy both prongs of the Commission’s test. . . . Instead of
subjecting press entities to content-based restrictions and inquiries, the
Commission should have granted the Requestors the affirmative protection of an
advisory opinion based upon the threshold determination that the publisher is a
press entity entitled to the media exemption when it publishes, markets, and
disseminates its book.”
No comments:
Post a Comment