Seventh, early voting
doesn’t increase turnout. Studies have shown that states that adopt early
voting have no empirical turnout increase.
Further, most of the problems from the long wait of the 102
year old voter President Obama highlighted in his state of the union last year to
the long lines generally happened during early voting.
Adams also lays out what should be the liberal case
against early voting. While many liberal
groups are advocating limiting spending on campaigns, early voting necessitates
spending more money. Instead of gearing most
campaigns limited campaign money toward a “Super Bowl” Election Day when
everyone is watching, now you have to spend money throughout
the playoffs or extended election period.
Fourth, early voting puts
more money into politics. Campaigns will be more expensive and complicated.
Leave it to a Washington commission to suggest the nationwide expansion of
early voting.
Adams makes a good government argument that
most conservatives concerned about government spending and liberals concerned
about protecting social programs may
find persuasive:
Second, early voting is
extremely expensive. When election officials drag out an election for weeks,
that means more poll workers, more broken machines, more salaries, more costs,
more everything.
Elections are already
expensive. Cash-strapped local governments should not have to spend many
millions more to run an election for weeks.
Where is the money coming from?
Adams has many more reasons than these few. The whole piece is worth reading. What is most interesting is Adams reasons run
the political gamut and should give pause for thought on early voting from all
parts of the political spectrum.
No comments:
Post a Comment