In the most actively cited
example of the Republican nominee’s foresight, Romneyites point to the
candidate’s hardline rhetoric last year against Russian President Vladimir
Putin and his administration. During the campaign, Romney frequently criticized
Obama for foolishly attempting to make common cause with the Kremlin, and
repeatedly referred to Russia as “our number one geopolitical foe.”
Many observers found this
fixation strange, and Democrats tried to turn it into a punchline. A New York
Times editorial in March of last year said Romney’s assertions regarding Russia
represented either “a shocking lack of knowledge about international affairs or
just craven politics.” And in an October debate, Obama sarcastically mocked his
opponent’s Russia rhetoric. “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign
policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years,” the president
quipped at the time.
. . . “Everyone
thought, Oh my goodness that is so clever and Mitt’s caught in the Cold War and
doesn’t know what he’s talking about,” O’Brien said. “Well guess what. With all
of these foreign policy initiatives — Syria, Iran, [Edward] Snowden — who’s out
there causing problems for America? It’s Putin and the Russians.” . . .
“The governor tried to
enunciate how to deal with these very hard, tough issues, and we were met with
slogans,” O’Brian lamented. “And now the real world is exposing the slogans as
being totally trite.”
The last few months have proved Governor Romney right. Yes, with slogans and a better campaign
President Obama was a better candidate.
But last night helped to prove to the American people that Governor
Romney would have been a better President.
No comments:
Post a Comment