The campaign committee Obama for America has morphed into a ‘nonprofit’
Organizing for Action. Questions are
raised about this new group as OFA also seems to offer donors exclusive access
to Obama in exchange for a contribution.
This Obomination is so outrageous that even those on the left are criticizing
it.
The New York Times reported
that for a donation of $500,000, you join the OFA Advisory Board, which grants
you quarterly meetings with Obama. A “Founders
Summit” also brought together OFA donors with former Obama officials in
Washington, D.C. The New York Times,
although it wanted to endorse OFA’s ideas, condemned
the group as “disturbing” in an editorial called “The White House Joins the Cash
Grab.”
As a 501(c)(4), the latest version of OFA is not subject to federal
contribution limits, prohibitions on White House officials soliciting
contributions, or campaign committee reporting requirements. But is it really so different from its
predecessor that it is a new entity? The
same OFA initials are not the only things Obama for America and ‘nonprofit’
Organizing for Action share. Organizing for Action controls Obama's e-mail list
and Twitter account. There are many ties
to the White House with Obama operatives at the helm of OFA.
Many left-leaning groups have come out against Organizing
for Action. Common Cause President Bob
Edgar said,
“If President Obama is serious about his often-expressed desire to rein in big
money in politics, he should shut down Organizing for Action and disavow any
plan to schedule regular meetings with its major donors. Access to the president
should never be for sale.” Fred Wertheimer of Democracy 21 said,
“Organizing for Action is unlike any entity we have ever seen before tied to a
president. This group is so tied to Obama himself, that it creates
opportunities for corporations and individuals to buy corrupting influence with
the administration – and at a minimum, to create the appearance of such
influence.” Progressives United’s executive director Cole Leystra said
OFA is exactly “what selling access looks like.”
No comments:
Post a Comment