While Democrats in Kentucky are making racist
attacks on Senator McConnell’s wife, Democrats in Virginia are making much
more subtle prejudicial claims. The
Democrat Party of Virginia of the past was one of Jim Crow and intimidation at
the polls. While the tragic bigotry of
the past Democrats was based on race, today it is best on partisanship and
names. That’s right. Your name can make you a figure of Democrat
ridicule and prejudicial attacks. MSNBC’s top on air personality Rachel Maddow injected
herself in a matter of local Virginia politics:
What just happened to old Hans von Spakovsky (best name in politics) in Fairfax County? -- Rachel Maddow MSNBC (@maddow)
For Fairfax County Democrats for the first time since the
days of Jim Crow opposed a pick by either party to be an election official. They accused him of bias. Problem is the record is empty of ANY proof
of bias. As RNLA’s Maya Noronha explains
in a recent PJMedia
piece Mr. Von Spakovsky voted with his fellow Democrat Election Board
Member 221 out of 224 times. The other
three times, the other board member who is not accused of bias, Secretary Carol Ann Coryell voted with Mr. Von
Spakovsky.
The biggest irony of the
whole thing is that the Democrats did
try to create a situation of potential bias and intimidation. As someone
who trains poll watchers and lawyer observers across the country let me just
say rule number one is you do not have partisan poll watchers talking to voters
inside the polling place. That can be
reasonably interpreted as electioneering or worse. Yet that is what these same Fairfax County
Democrats tried to do just before the 2012 election. They wanted all of their poll watchers in 273
poll places to be able to talk to voters inside the polling place.
One quick example of why
this is a problem: Say a voter is having problems with a machine and is
concerned the machine is not registering their vote properly (a relatively
common complaint heard from elderly supporters of both parties), under the
Fairfax County Democrats scenario you could hear “I am Joe Public from the
Democrat party here to help you.” Or
worse, “I am Joe Public and I will tell you how to vote” pretending to be an
election official and ensure they vote Democrat. And does anyone think most voters know the
difference between a partisan poll official and an actual nonpartisan election
official?
Think this does not happen?
Talk to people in Florida during the 2004 election where
during early voting some local election officials allowed just such a thing
saying that Florida law on poll watchers and voting did not apply during to the
then new “early voting.” Democrat poll
watchers went into voting booths to “assist” voters. That’s why there are rules against poll
watchers talking to voters.
President Obama formed a
commission to look into voting and Friday he mentioned this commission would “help prevent state officials from engaging in ‘new tricks’ that
discourage minorities from voting.”
Thanks to the Virginia courts and people like Von Spakovsky, the Fairfax
County Virginia Democrat Party was prevented from engaging in such a “new
trick” in 2012. As Maya’s
article points out, the wrong person is being accused of bias.
I wonder if Virginia
election official Hans Von Spakovsky and Fairfax County Virginia Chairman Cesar
del Aguila switched names if Democrats and liberals would still attack Mr. Von
Spakovsky? That is a tough question but I
am sure Rachel Maddow would not snark.
No comments:
Post a Comment