After four long days of hearings, Americans now have a glimpse of a man and judge who is kind, thoughtful, humble, intelligent, and intellectually curious, possesses incredible endurance, has an encyclopedic knowledge of the law, has a consistent judicial philosophy of looking first to the text of the relevant law at issue, works very hard to get the right answer in each case and be fair to all litigants, and has a deep respect for the Constitution, the separation of powers, federalism, and the rule of law. And we also have a depressing picture of what the next two years of Democratic presidential primary will look like.
Judge Kavanaugh: I'm optimistic about the future of America and the future of our independent judiciary. If confirmed, I will always strive to preserve the Constitution of the United States and the rule of law.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Here are the top ten moments and takeaways from the hearings.
1. Judge Kavanaugh's poise, including his serious responses to Democrats' questions that were trying to trap him, have him disclose his personal policy views, or commit on how he would rule in future cases:
But Judge Kavanaugh is keeping his composure and not being distracted (though it's certainly distracting for the watchers). https://t.co/XzQ28psS8X— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
Democrats' legal theory boils down to policy outcomes / legal realism. That's why they always disparage nominees of Republican presidents' efforts to articulate a consistent interpretive theory and claims to decide cases on neutral principles. https://t.co/IfO5PDsbsV— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 7, 2018
2. Judge Kavanaugh's repeated description of the proper role of a judge, including a deep and consistent interpretive philosophy relying on the text of the Constitution and statutes:
Judge Kavanaugh: My personal beliefs are not relevant to how I decide cases. Role of precedent is to ensure stability & predictability in the law, which is critically important. People rely on decisions of the courts. Precedent reinforces independence & impartiality of judiciary.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
Judge Kavanaugh responding to 1st question from Chairman Grassley: First quality of a good judge in our Constitutional system is independence, which comes directly from Article III. Guaranteed by the Founders in structure, so immune from public and political pressure.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
Judge Kavanaugh: Courts upset compromises involved in legislative process if they do not stick to the text of the law as written, as passed by Congress and signed by the President.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 6, 2018
Sen. Lee and Judge Kavanaugh just had a great exchange on the nature of originalism and textualism and what interpretive methods judges should use.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
Judge Kavanaugh: Good judge is impartial, interprets the law as written. Treats litigants with respect. Writes understandable opinions. Civility and collegiality. Understands that decisions affect real people in the real world. Pays attention to precedent.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
Judge Kavanaugh: Being a good judge requires backbone & courage. Respect for precedent, which comes from "judicial power" in Art. III. Paying attention to the words written in Constitution & statutes. Not doing what judge wants to do or deferring when executive rewrites the laws.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
3. Judge Kavanaugh's repeated description of the separation of powers:
Judge Kavanaugh: Separation of powers protects individual liberty because it responds to the concern the Framers had about the accumulation of power in one body leading to tyranny.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
4. How those who knew Judge Kavanaugh and have practiced before him praised him highly both personally and as a judge, while the third-party witnesses from Democrats largely made policy points:
Lawyer Lisa Blatt has argued 35 cases before Supreme Court, more than any other woman. Liberal, Democrat, pro-abortion. But urges Senate to confirm Kavanaugh - "By any objective measure, Judge Kavanaugh is clearly qualified to serve on the Supreme Court."— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Former DSG Mahoney: Judge Kavanaugh is one of the hardest working judges, renowned for his work ethic. Most of the appellate bar in DC has argued before him and knows him; don't know anyone who doesn't put him in the highest category; thought Kavanaugh should be nominee.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 7, 2018
5. Senator Ben Sasse's civics lesson on Tuesday (and great questions throughout):
Sen. Sasse's (first) civics lesson during #KavanaughConfirmation: Congress punts power to executive branch agencies because legislators don't want to take responsibility for tough decisions. People lose ability to speak through elections. No accountability over 4th branch.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Sen. Sasse: Constitution places policymaking power in Congress. Congress should be responsive to politics, not judiciary.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Sen. Sasse: Legislature supposed to be center of politics, but has deferred to executive. So political battleground has transferred to Supreme Court as place to control. Legislature, not courts, designed to be controversial. Leaves power with people.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Sen. Sasse: Supreme Court becomes substitute political battleground. Look for nine justices to be super-legislators. That's why people want "empathy" from justices.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Sen. Sasse: So question before committee is whether Judge Kavanaugh has temperament and character to set aside his personal views as irrelevant when he goes to work every day and judge cases on the laws.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
6. Senator Cory Booker's "Spartacus" moment that wasn't (but then after Sen. Booker was criticized for claiming courage for releasing documents cleared for release, he then did release confidential documents in violation of Senate Rules):
This exercise today is a reminder that these documents could have been made public if members had simply asked the committee— Senator Hatch Office (@senorrinhatch) September 6, 2018
It wouldn’t have allowed for a “Spartacus” moment but it would have followed with the protocol @ChuckGrassley offered for weeks
https://t.co/wuWbgr6Tq0
Sen. Tillis warns of consequences of making Senate Judiciary an untrusted body to receive documents under the Presidential Records Act. Suggests that senators release all email records related to Kavanaugh nomination immediately, says he is willing to do so.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 6, 2018
Let me get this straight: "Spartacus" Booker violates Senate rules to leak confidential documents which show Kavanaugh giving reasonable legal advice in support of positions Booker himself believes? Beyond unhinged.— Carrie Severino (@JCNSeverino) September 6, 2018
So the political "courage" by Dem senators this morning was purely (not just mostly) political theater. https://t.co/yPutYb9IPZ— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 6, 2018
“You know... I knew Spartacus.” pic.twitter.com/94eGPCkOp1— Senator Hatch Office (@senorrinhatch) September 6, 2018
7. Refreshingly serious questions and dialogue with Judge Kavanaugh from Senators Chris Coons and Amy Klobuchar, even if their interpretations of cases and legal theories were often misguided. But unfortunately for Sen. Klobuchar's presidential ambitions, it's unlikely that deeper thinking about the law will mean much to the increasingly liberal, outcome-oriented Democratic base:
Yes, Senators Klobuchar and Coons have asked questions about cases and legal interpretation and had real debates with Judge Kavanaugh. Their questions have been a refreshing break from the political theater of their Dem colleagues. https://t.co/ztzfxpIkRC— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 7, 2018
8. Senator Kamala Harris' bizarre questions about conversations with anyone at Kasowitz Benson Torres, a law firm with over 350 people, that ultimately proved to be only an attempt to cast unfounded aspersions at Judge Kavanaugh:
More political theater from a 2020 Dem presidential candidate. Shocking. https://t.co/SyTY7PKHC7— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 6, 2018
9. Judge Kavanaugh's tattered pocket Constitution, which Senator Harris disparagingly referred to as "that book that you carry":
Judge Kavanaugh notes that his tattered pocket Constitution is old enough to not contain the 27th Amd, ratified in 1992. He has written in 27th Amd. He uses it in teaching his Harvard Law classes, which he starts with tour of the Constitution.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 6, 2018
.@KamalaHarris just talked pejoratively about “that book that you carry” referring to the Constitution on Judge #Kavanaugh's table #SCOTUS— Raj Shah (@RajShah45) September 6, 2018
10. Chairman Grassley's leadership throughout, from being gracious to the Democrats despite their obvious lack of good faith to correcting many of the Democrats' misstatements using his prerogative as Chair to allowing Judge Kavanaugh to respond at the end of a questioning period when a Democrat hadn't allowed the Judge to answer. Likewise, the good points and questions made by the Republican members of the committee:
Chairman Grassley: Glad American people have finally had an opportunity to hear from Judge Kavanaugh. Answers have been compelling. Record proves that unquestionably qualified to serve on Supreme Court. Also very impressed with Judge as a person, lifetime of public service.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 7, 2018
Chairman Grassley responds to Dems' interruptions - assertion of executive privilege over Bush docs in accordance with Supreme Court interpretation of executive privilege - types of decisions requiring confidentiality. In accordance with treatment of Kagan records.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Chairman Grassley says he will let people speak but not accommodate all obstruction. But hearing will go on until finished, no matter how long Dems make it last.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 4, 2018
Sen. Tillis challenges people to actually read Judge Kavanaugh's opinions and see how thoughtful they are. Hard to believe claims when see how often other judges agree with Kavanaugh. Don't judge someone based on someone else's judgment. Judge based on body of work.— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 6, 2018
It is ironic that Senator Ben Sasse , a non-lawyer, is asking better, more substantive questions and commentary than many Democrat Senate Judiciary Committee Members who are lawyers. #ConfirmKavanaugh— RNLA (@TheRepLawyer) September 5, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment