In May, RNLA Executive
Director Michael Thielen recounted the
Obama administration’s long held propensities for election tampering, the
latest effort being the DHS’s bid under former Secretary Jeh Johnson to
infiltrate numerous state election voter databases during the 2016 election
cycle.
Johnson testified last week before
the Senate Intelligence Committee, however, that, even though he did not
believe that “votes were altered or suppressed in some way,” his organization
did not report on potential Russian hacking for the sake of non-partisanship.
David Warrington, RNLA Vice
President for Election Education, highlights the
Democratic Party’s herculean attempt during this hearing to scapegoat anyone
else for its own illegal forays into elections:
Leaving aside for a minute that Russia
‘hacking’ the 2016 election is a wildly inaccurate portrayal of Russia's
digital meddling — which to date are only allegations, nothing proven —
there's likely another reason Johnson wasn't quick to cry foul: some of the
known, legitimate attempts to hack into state election databases were
perpetrated by Johnson's own organization, the Obama-led DHS.
DHS is not alone. As we
detailed Friday, even Democrats are raising questions of interference with
the election regarding Obama Administration Attorney General Loretta Lynch. What
does all this mean? As Warrington concludes the continued fixation on Russia:
They are little more than an attempt to protect
the previous administration from being exposed as election
meddlers, albeit unsuccessful ones. But Hillary
Clinton's leaked emails, which showed the Democratic National
Committee colluding with her campaign to ensure she won the nomination over Bernie
Sanders, have already proven that meddling in democratic
processes is a strategy the left employs to win.
Partisan politics in the end is driving this Russia hacking myth. And as Michael Thielen put it, “the reality is that there’s more evidence linking a US federal agency under Obama to state election hacking than there is linking Russia to the presidential election.”
No comments:
Post a Comment