It’s kind of like a head coach of a football team, as
a fan, petitioning his coaching staff to run a new offensive scheme.
This exceptional move is a publicity stunt by the
Democratic commissioners that ignores the inherent power of their role as
Commissioners. In the FEC’s monthly meeting the conversation digressed into
defining Weintraub’s personhood rather than highlighting Weintraub’s title as
Commissioner.
The purpose of petitions is to give citizens a voice, and
not for commissioners to try to make political points with the extremes of
their party's base. Unfortunately, the tactic diminishes the voice of the
people generally.
Even the legality of Weintraub’s petition is at issue
because it is so unusual. Per Vice Chair Matthew Petersen’s suggestion, the
panel decided to hold off on their vote to determine its legality under the Administrative
Procedure Act.
Ravel and Weintraub could have left the role of the people to
the people because ultimately, Public Citizen, a liberal watchdog group, filed
essentially the same petition the next day. Now the commissioners
can perform their intended duties and vote on whether or not to initiate the
rulemaking.
Here, Weintraub’s effort shows the extremes (such as petitioning
themselves) that Democrat FEC Commissioners will go to in order to advance
their agenda. Now the “people,” or citizens without the political authority of
a commissioner, played their established part in filing a petition. This leaves
Weintraub’s petition as a redundant political tool serving no purpose other
than to highlight her open disdain for views that are different from hers. The
Commission will determine in July whether to publish Weintraub’s petition in
the federal register.
No comments:
Post a Comment