President
Obama recently nominated Georgetown Law Professor Pamela Harris to the Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeals. As her nomination awaits confirmation from Congress, her
previous public statements are under scrutiny.
At her
confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee
last Thursday, Texas Senator Ted Cruz challenged Harris for her previous
descriptions of the Constitution as “a profoundly progressive document.” Iowa
Senator Chuck Grassley also expressed concerns about Harris’ ability to guard
against “imposing [her] own views” in her decision making.
Professor
Harris is a member of the American Constitution Society (ACS), the nation’s leading
progressive legal organization. The National Review writes that this “confirms that she is precommitted to imposing
her left-wing political preferences from the federal bench.” At an event
promoting her book, Harris said, “I sometimes wonder whether when we
think about someone like Chief Justice Warren . . . whether we almost have, by
now, a stunted sense of what the legal choices really are, what really is a
liberal legal outcome . . . I
think that we’ve stunted the spectrum of legal thought in a way that removes
the possibility that there could have been more progressive readings of the
Fourth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment.” The National Review observes that this nominee “believes the
Warren Court was too conservative.”
In another post, The
National Review wrote that “she reads her contemporary
political preferences into her view of the Constitution.” In 2008, Harris said, “I just don’t think that any account of the
Constitution that even seems to privilege the Constitution as it was originally
ratified, . . . I don’t think it’s consistent with the way most people do—and
the way we should—think about the Constitution.” She went on to say that judges
should instead appeal to general values and principles found in the
Constitution.
Harris gained
years of experience in appellate litigation when she was a partner at O’Melveny
& Myers. Harris was also an advisor to Attorney General Eric Holder when
she worked at the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.
Harris’
nomination is heralded by liberal organizations. The New Republic praises her
as a woman who has “a great professional network that
will give rise to the next generation of liberal legal elites; and she will be
an eloquent and inspiring champion of liberal jurisprudence.”
Professor
Harris’ nomination raises significant questions regarding her understanding of
Constitutional authority and her willingness to honor the Constitution over her
personal political beliefs.
No comments:
Post a Comment