The Atlanta Journal
Constitution(AJC) editorializes correctly on the fact that Voter
ID is not racist.
Elections data
reviewed by the AJC show that participation among black voters rose by 44
percent from 2006 — before the law was implemented — to 2010. For Hispanics,
the increase for the same period was 67 percent. Turnout among whites rose 12
percent.
It was
expected that African American turnout would spike in 2008, when Barack Obama
became the first person of color to win the presidency. And it did rise to
historic highs in Georgia.
Black
participation fell in 2010, as it did for all demographic groups. Still, a far
greater share of black voters turned out in 2010 than in 2006, showing that
Obama was not the only factor driving turnout.
Time and time again it is
shown that Voter ID does not suppress minority voting and that critics who use
that false argument are playing the race card in an incendiary and purely
political way.
However, the article goes on to talk
about zero fraudulent votes being cast when not even realizing that their own
numbers show fraudulent voting efforts. The AJC
writes.
Still, the law has had
real and measurable effect for some voters: Since November 2008, the ballots of
1,586 Georgians didn’t count because of the law. (They arrived at the polls
without a photo ID, cast provisional ballots, and did not return later with the
required ID.) Overall, 13.6 million votes were cast in the state during the
same period.
What the AJC fails to realize is some
of these 1586 votes were fraudulent and certainly not "Georgian voters."
The provisional ballot system worked. Provisional ballots which were
adopted in the bipartisan Help America Vote Act, allow for review of
questionable ballots. If these so-called “voters” wanted to vote they
could have returned with ID or even received a free ID provided under Georgia
law.
They did not. While there are a
number of potential reasons for this, one of the reasons is they were not real
Georgia voters. For Voter ID not only stops “voter impersonation” it also
stops out of state and out of precinct voters.
Of those 1500+ people who turned away
it strains credibility to say they all did not have IDs. It should not be
forgotten that in the Supreme Court case declaring ID constitutional, one of
the plaintiffs herself had an ID from another state. She was looking to
be able to vote in two places.
Voter ID is working in Georgia and is
not disenfranchising voters.
The same is true everywhere. It
is time for Eric Holder and Democrat front groups like the Brennan Center to
stop claiming otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment